'Bigg Boss' Winner Elvish Yadav Thrashes YouTuber Maxtern Over Social Media Clash

A social media fight between two YouTubers, Sagar 'Maxtern' Thakur and Big Boss OTT fame, Elvish Yadav took an ugly turn when the latter called Maxtern to a place in Gurugram to beat the YouTuber up, over a small social media back and forth. The whole issue started when Maxtern posted a meme about Elvish Meeting Big Boss 17 winner, Munawar Faruqui. Yadav didn't like Maxtern poking fun at him, and then warned him that the latter stays in Delhi, and the consequences of poking him would not be good for him. 

Also Read: Twitch Streamer TwoMad Passes Away At The Age Of 23

Elvish Yadav vs Maxtern Fight: Timeline of Events 

Maxtern had been posting on social media about Elvish and his fanbase, and after a lot of posts, Elvish finally replied to him on social media. Thakur later posted a screenshot of him having a conversation with Elvish, where Thakur was given a time and place to meet him. In a video posted by Maxtern, he informed his X followers that he was on his way to meet Elvish and that he was travelling alone. A few hours later, he posted an update saying that Elvish came with eight-10 people and a fight broke out with Sagar being minorly injured on the lip.

However, a video of the fight leaked online, where Elvish is seen entering a place with eight-10 men and starts beating Thakur up. Some of them also tried to break the fight, but most of them were helping Elvish beat the YouTuber. In an FIR registered against Elvish, Thakur alleged the following: 

Elvish Yadav tried to break my spine so that I will become physically disabled. I was asked by Elvish Yadav to meet but I thought it was about verbal discussion. When he came to the store, he and his 8-10 goons, who were drunk started beating me and started using abusive language. 

 Additionally, Maxtern also said that he was given death threats by Elvish. Now, Maxtern has informed his audience that an FIR is registered under these sections of the IPC 147, 149, 323, and 506. He has also alleged, "These are bailable sections, and despite clear evidence of an attempt to murder, no non-bailable charges were included."